Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Trademark Cases filed in the Michigan Western District Court before Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 6 of 6
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
August 2, 2007
Alfenas v. Pantera Partnership et al
All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & orders
court opinions & orders
MI Western Enslen Trademark Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff: Leif Alfenas; Defendant: Pantera Partnership, Vincent Paul Abbott, Philip Hanson Anselmo, Rex Robert Brown, Estate of Darell Lance ("Dimebag Darrell") Abbott
 
June 19, 2007
Traverse City Auto Plaza, Inc. v. Cherry Capital Cars, Inc. MI Western Enslen Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff: Traverse City Auto Plaza, Inc.; Defendant: Cherry Capital Cars, Inc.
 
June 6, 2006
Leco Corporation v. Cheboygan Yacht Clut at Pier 33 LLC et al MI Western Enslen Trademark Trademark Infringement
July 12, 2005
Healthcare Compliance Resources, LLC v. Physician Reimbursement Services of Houston Inc. et al MI Western Enslen Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
November 30, 2004
Wandel et al v. K&N Engineering, Inc. MI Western Enslen Trademark Trademark Infringement
April 9, 2004
Poppa John's, Inc. v. Triad Investment Company, L.L.C. MI Western Enslen Trademark Petition for Removal
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.