District of Michigan Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 756
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00526
Plaintiff: Alda C. Washington
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Cross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00522
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Clark v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00519
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Ault v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2015cv00513
Plaintiff: Michael R. Ault
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00506
Plaintiff: Tamara Lee Wood
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Adam v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00501
Plaintiff: Eric K. Adam
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff: Richard Duane Brooks
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Rathfon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff: Dennis George Rathfon, Sr.
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00463
Plaintiff: Christine Lin Franklin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Finney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00460
Plaintiff: Connie Finney
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.