US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,626
Shaver #221589 v. Campbell
as 1:2023cv01167
Petitioner:
Ivory Lee Shaver #221589
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen #732946 v. Davids
as 1:2023cv01144
Petitioner:
Demareo Allen #732946
Respondent:
John Davids
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dowdell v. Michigan, State of
as 1:2023cv01151
Petitioner:
Lawrence James Dowdell
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown #408842 v. Storey
as 2:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Jason Alan Brown #408842
Respondent:
Barbra Storey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard #536729 v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Paul Allen Bernard #536729
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowrey #641269 v. Nagy
as 1:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Michael Shaun Lowrey #641269
Respondent:
Noah Nagy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. Olmstead
as 1:2023cv01100
Petitioner:
Ryan Ledean Gillespie
Respondent:
Russell Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Musafir #414739 v. Schroeder
as 2:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
Yusuf Abdur-Raheem Musafir #414739
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson #185313 v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Maurice Jackson #185313
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Person #899333 v. Corrigan
as 1:2023cv01008
Petitioner:
Treavion Person #899333
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
