Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and



Other Statutes - Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in the Minnesota District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 18 of 18
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
February 18, 2009
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. Einess MN Magnuson Constitutionality of State Statutes Indian Tribal Controversy
Plaintiff: Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Defendant: Ward Einess
 
February 10, 2009
Progressive Northern Insurance Co. v. Raisner-Zimpelman MN Doty Constitutionality of State Statutes Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff: Progressive Northern Insurance Co. Defendant: Sadie L. Raisner-Zimpelman
 
January 21, 2009
American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota v. Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy et al MN Tunheim Constitutionality of State Statutes Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota Defendant: Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy, Islamic Relief USA, Alice Seagren, Minnesota Department of Education, The, Asad Zaman and others...
 
September 29, 2008
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc et al v. Ritchie et al MN Davis Constitutionality of State Statutes Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff: American Broadcasting Companies, Inc, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc, Associated Press and others... Defendant: Mark Ritchie, Mark Ritchie, Lori Swanson, Lori Swanson
 
September 18, 2008
281 Care Committee et al v. Arneson et al MN Frank Constitutionality of State Statutes Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff: 281 Care Committee, 281 Care Committee, Ron Stoffel, Ron Stoffel, W.I.S.E. Citizen Committee and others... Defendant: Ross Arneson, Mike Freeman, Michael Junge, Tom N Kelly
 
July 16, 2007
Mellum v. Bio World Merchandising, Inc MN Ericksen Constitutionality of State Statutes Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff: Carl Mellum; Defendant: Bio World Merchandising, Inc
 
April 9, 2007
Avritt et al v. ReliaStar Life Insurance Company MN Magnuson Constitutionality of State Statutes Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Avritt, Alan Avritt; Defendant: ReliaStar Life Insurance Company
 
December 6, 2006
Paul's Industrial Garage, LLC v. City of Red Wing MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
October 13, 2006
Stuke v. Minnesota, State of MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
August 17, 2006
Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center v. Ludeman MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
March 27, 2006
Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
March 10, 2006
BNSF Railway Company v. Hatch MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
January 30, 2006
Patch v. Posusta MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
December 1, 2005
Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway Company v. Orr, City of et al MN Davis Constitutionality of State Statutes
October 28, 2005
Caswell et al v. City of Bloomington MN Kyle Constitutionality of State Statutes
Young America Corporation v. Ivey et al MN Ericksen Constitutionality of State Statutes
December 10, 2004
Bisciglia et al v. Lee et al MN Doty Constitutionality of State Statutes
February 13, 2004
Union Pacific Rail, et al v. Salomone, et al MN Constitutionality of State Statutes
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.