US District Court for the District of Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,624
Woodard v. USA
as 0:2024cv01080
Petitioner: Jyron Mendall Woodard
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01034
Petitioner: Zantra Williams
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff: Gordon Miles
Defendant: Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bobo v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00988
Petitioner: Theodore Harold Edward Bobo, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner: Cederic Lamont Berry
Respondent: Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant: Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner: Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. LOHMEIER
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant: Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Newcomb v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00876
Petitioner: Justin Newcomb
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?