Minnesota Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,232
Miller et al v. Target Corporation
as 0:2024cv01323
Plaintiff:
Bria Miller and Jordan Judt
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Vivorte, Inc. v. Gill
as 0:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Vivorte, Inc.
Defendant:
Jagi Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Costa Rica Recovery SA v. Rivard et al
as 0:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Costa Rica Recovery SA
Defendant:
Ryan Rivard and Bespoken Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Swenson v. Kuehni et al
as 0:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Mary Swenson
Defendant:
John Kuehni, Susan Kuehni, Cathi Ivanscheck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Social Security Income et al
as 0:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
LaGracious Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Income, Lynwoods Apartments and Credit Bereau - Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Genstar Insurance Services, LLC et al v. Venske et al
as 0:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Genstar Insurance Services, LLC and Landmark American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brandon Venske, Joshua Venske and Newell Brands, Inc.
Elson v. Legacy, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Steve Elson
Defendant:
Legacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Barre v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Barre Yusuf Barre
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Venmar Ventilation, ULC
as 0:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Venmar Ventilation, ULC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
