Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,647
Debenedetto v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Debenedetto v. Klien et al
as 0:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
M. Klien, E. Lindeman, S. Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debenedetto v. Ford et al
as 0:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Mr Ford, RN. Officer Davidson, Associate Warden Mells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00637
Petitioner:
Micheal Delgado Martinez
Respondent:
Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ducasse v. King
as 0:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Hiram Ducasse, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2024cv00571
Petitioner:
Madison Ward
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bahtuoh et al v. White et al
as 0:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dineaa Bahtuoh and Derrick DaSean Holliday
Defendant:
Jeffrey White and Kathryn Halverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe v. USA
as 0:2024cv00500
Petitioner:
Peter George Noe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
