US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Chambers v. Green-Stubbs et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
Patricia Chambers
Defendant:
Stefany's Vocal & Performance Training Studios, LLC and Stephanie Green-Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
HIG Staffing Solutions, LLC v. Relias, LLC
as 1:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
HIG Staffing Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Relias, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Limoss US, LLC v. Kaidi LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
Limoss US, LLC
Defendant:
Changzhou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. and Kaidi LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. DeSoto County School District
as 3:2018cv00132
Defendant:
DeSoto County School District
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Larson's Piggly Wiggly
as 3:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Larson's Piggly Wiggly
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Max Home LLC v. Bauhaus Furniture Group, LLC
as 1:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Max Home LLC
Defendant:
Bauhaus Furniture Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Dryshod International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Dryshod International, LLC and James K. Donohue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cox v. Morris et al
as 3:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
James B. Cox
Defendant:
James Morris, James Noland and Brandon Hackett
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Madden Home Design, LLC v. Oxford Commons I, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Oxford Commons I, LLC and David Blackburn
Plaintiff:
Madden Home Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
