US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Campbell v. Robert J. Young Company, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Campbell
Defendant:
Robert J. Young Company, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hucks v. G6 Hospitality, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Richard Hucks
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality, LLC , Elizabeth Ceballas , John Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Monroe v. WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00960
Plaintiff:
Howard Monroe
Defendant:
WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc. and John Does (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wade v. Worldwide Labor Support of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00322
Defendant:
Worldwide Labor Support of Illinois, Inc. and Wayne A. Cook, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Charles Wade and Luis A. Feliz Lugo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Watkins v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC
as 2:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
James L. Watkins
Defendant:
Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Wigley v. River's End Holding Company
as 3:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelso Wigley
Defendant:
River's End Holding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Pacific Bells, LLC
as 3:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Simmons
Defendant:
Pacific Bells, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers v. Rowan Companies, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Myers
Defendant:
Rowan Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Medline Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Rogers
Defendant:
Medline Industries, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC, Laboratory Corporation of America , Medreview LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
