District of Mississippi Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,243
Cowans v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2015cv00077
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Class of Other Officials et al
as 2:2015cv00075
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Bridges et al
as 1:2015cv00093
Plaintiff: Fontay Taylor
Defendant: David Bridges, Dawson Johnson, Dawson's Bail Bonding and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cannon v. City of Tupelo et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff: Al Jerome Cannon
Defendant: City of Tupelo , Bart Aguirre , L. P. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Leflore County, Mississippi
as 4:2015cv00059
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Leflore County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
McDougle v. Neshoba County, MS et al
as 3:2015cv00350
Plaintiff: Brittney McDougle
Defendant: Neshoba County, MS, Tommy Waddell, City of Philadelphia, MS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Ishie v. City of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00069
Plaintiff: Daniel A. Ishie
Defendant: City of Southaven, Mississippi, Germaine Barton, Justin Fox
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety
as 3:2015cv00334
Plaintiff: Ralph Sanders
Defendant: Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff: Annie Williams
Defendant: Management & Training Corporation, Timothy Outlaw
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Jackson State University et al
as 3:2015cv00326
Plaintiff: Michael C. Anderson
Defendant: Jackson State University , John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.