District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 8,921
Ward v. U. S. District Court et al
as 3:2015cv00371
Plaintiff: Preston David Ward
Defendant: U. S. District Court, State of Mississippi , U. S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sonnier v. Hogan
as 3:2015cv00370
Plaintiff: Joseph Dale Sonnier
Defendant: Norris Hogan
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Byrd
as 1:2015cv00156
Plaintiff: Michael Cochran
Defendant: Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Averett v. Poe et al
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff: Demetrious Lawon Averett
Defendant: Terry Poe, David Allison, Julie Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 3:2015cv00356
Plaintiff: Donald Keith Smith
Defendant: Angel Myers, Victor Carmody, Jr., Kevin Stewart
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchard v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2015cv00357
Plaintiff: Lyndell Marcell Pritchard
Defendant: Lauderdale County , State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Lee
as 3:2015cv00073
Petitioner: Eric Troy Powell
Respondent: Ernest Lee
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Loper et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff: Stanley Montgomery
Defendant: Joseph H. Loper, Jr., Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2015cv00352
Plaintiff: Stacie Nichole Dunn
Defendant: Lauderdale County, Ken Dulaney, William D. Sollie and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Smith v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00354
Plaintiff: Willie Albert Smith
Defendant: State of Mississippi, Shirley Robinson, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.