Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Patent Cases filed in the Missouri Eastern District Court before Charles A. Shaw [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 23 of 23
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 23, 2009
Alfa-Pet, Inc. v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Alfa-Pet, Inc. Defendant: Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.
 
October 7, 2009
Fluid Control Products, Inc. v. Aeromotive, Inc. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Fluid Control Products, Inc. Defendant: Aeromotive, Inc.
 
June 30, 2009
Alzheimer's Institute of America, Inc. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Alzheimer's Institute of America, Inc.
 
April 10, 2009
Whitney Design, Inc. v. Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Whitney Design, Inc.; Defendant: Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc.
 
October 29, 2008
Nestec S.A. v. Wysong Corporation MO Eastern Buckles Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Nestec S.A.; Defendant: Wysong Corporation
 
September 16, 2008
Inteplast Group, Ltd. v, Coroplast, Inc. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Inteplast Group, Ltd.; Defendant: Coroplast, Inc.
 
February 28, 2008
Lifeline Technologies, Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Lifeline Technologies, Inc.; Defendant: Archer Daniels Midland Company
 
January 16, 2008
Industrial Wire Products, Inc. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Industrial Wire Products, Inc.; Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation
 
December 20, 2007
Monsanto Company et al v. Tidball et al MO Eastern Stohr Patent Patent Infringement
June 6, 2007
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Ameren Corporation et al MO Eastern Medler Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.; Defendant: Ameren Corporation, Union Electric Company
 
March 14, 2007
AMC Centurion AB v. Galtronics Ltd. et al MO Eastern Shaw Patent No cause code entered
Plaintiff: AMC Centurion AB; Defendant: Galtronics Ltd., Galtronics USA, Inc.
 
December 28, 2006
Laird Technologies, Inc. v. Galtronics Ltd., et al. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
August 28, 2006
Furminator, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corp. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
August 2, 2006
World Wide Stationery Manufacturing Co., LTD v. Hong Kong Stationery Manufacturing Co., LTD. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
May 10, 2006
Maritz Inc. v. C/Base, Inc. et al MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
May 5, 2006
Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. v. Open Biosystems, Inc. MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
May 3, 2006
Orthoarm, Inc. v. Forestadent USA, Inc. et al MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
February 2, 2006
Monsanto Company et al v. Oswald MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
January 30, 2006
Monsanto Company et al v. Vanderhoof MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
January 20, 2006
Monsanto Company et al v. Kueckelhan MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
January 5, 2006
Furminator, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corp. et al MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
January 13, 2005
Emerson Electric Co. v. Holmes Group, Inc., The MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
October 25, 2004
United States Can Company v. Limited Brands, Inc. et al MO Eastern Shaw Patent Patent Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.