US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 482
Malloy v. Trileaf Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deborah Malloy
Defendant:
Trileaf Corporation and T. Scott Muschany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Su v. Shamrock Concrete LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Shamrock Concrete LLC, Shamrock Contracting, LLC and Ryan P. Litchfield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nash et al v. DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Roderick Nash, Teresa Hill and Stephanie Turner
Defendant:
DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harrison v. Maid2Clean Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Harrison
Defendant:
Maid2Clean Services LLC and Elizabeth Evans
Richardson v. Maid2Clean Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Erica Richardson
Defendant:
Maid2Clean Services LLC and Elizabeth Evans
Faries v. GILL GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Wesley Faries
Defendant:
GILL GROUP, INC., Samuel L Gill, Chad B Gill and others
Cole v. Veterans Security Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Daquane Cole
Defendant:
Veterans Security Services, LLC, Jason Alexander and Steve Allan Gibson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Merridith v. Vallee Logistics LLC
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Peretha Merridith
Defendant:
Vallee Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castello v. Sudora, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Cecilia A. Castello
Defendant:
Sudora, LLC doing business as Sudora Computer Services and Robert Charles Meyers, Jr.
Archer v. Robinson Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ryan Archer
Defendant:
Robinson Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
