US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,416
Pentlin v. USA
as 4:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Jonathon M Pentlin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alva-Joya v. USA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Ali Alva-Joya
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kampe v. Page
as 2:2024cv04037
Petitioner:
Jamie Ray Kampe
Respondent:
Justine Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derges v. USA
as 6:2024cv03073
Petitioner:
Patricia Ashton Derges
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Norris v. Dr Vera et al
as 6:2024cv03065
Plaintiff:
Herbert Overton Norris and Herbert Jefferson Overton Jr
Defendant:
Dr Vera, Dr Rice, PA Kirsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cruz-Basurto v. Falkenrath
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Isidro Cruz-Basurto
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. USA
as 4:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Jordan M Grimes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McElroy v. Beadles et al
as 6:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Raymond Glenn McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles and James Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. Chief Atcher et al
as 5:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Dylan James Damron
Defendant:
Chief Atcher, Nancy and Jessica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
