New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,328
BAKER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
COREY BAKER
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and CFG MEDICAL SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
DEONDRAE L. KING
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ACTING WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEREDAY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01669
Plaintiff:
ALBERT M SEREDAY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS, REBECCA FRANCESCHINNI, MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RYAN
Defendant:
R. ROBINSON, T. JONES and M. CASTELLANOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Hudson Correctional Center
as 2:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Almondo Gutierrez
Defendant:
Hudson Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL et al v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
MIKAL S. MITCHELL, KAL SHAREEF EL, SERGIO ROSADO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORSEY v. BURNS et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. DORSEY
Defendant:
MS. BURNS, MR. ADEOLINE, DAVID ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULGER v. CITY OF PHILLIPSBURG et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
DANNY BULGER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILLIPSBURG, WARREN COUNTY, WARREN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
