US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 11,253
Footman v. Doherty et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Karon Footman
Defendant:
Dale Doherty, Jeffrey Foster, Errol D Toulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. The County of Nassau, New York et al
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Belton
Defendant:
The County of Nassau, New York, The Sheriff of Nassau, Anthony Larocco (Sheriff) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Codner v. USA
as 1:2024cv02079
Petitioner:
Arthur Codner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edo v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Enekan Edo
Defendant:
Officer Danial Ryan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Celestine v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02060
Petitioner:
Fritz Celestine
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Auburn Correctional Facility Package Room
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Ashonta Z. Parker
Defendant:
Auburn Correctional Facility Package Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salley v. 114th Precinct
as 1:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Charles Vernon Salley
Defendant:
114th Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. New York State
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Ricardo McCray
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antonelly v. John Doe Nassau County Correctional Officers et al
as 2:2024cv01935
Plaintiff:
Castro Cuadrado Antonelly
Defendant:
John Doe Nassau County Correctional Officers, John Doe Commissioner, John Doe Maintenance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
