US District Court for the Northern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,692
Mothersell v. Hood
as 9:2024cv00254
Petitioner: Robert M. Mothersell
Respondent: Todd Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Lilley
as 9:2024cv00158
Petitioner: David J. Decker
Respondent: Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Lowerre We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00123
Petitioner: Wardell Watson
Respondent: E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 9:2024cv00062
Petitioner: Murray Hall, III
Respondent: NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bumpars v. Corey
as 9:2024cv00054
Petitioner: Devante Andrew Bumpars
Respondent: The People of the State of New York, DOCCS and Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. McGuiness
as 9:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Tommy Davis
Respondent: Thomas McGuiness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner: David E. Struble
Respondent: Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khalil v. Farideh P.
as 9:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Ahmed S. Khalil, Ahmed Shawki Mohamed Khalil and Ahmed Q.
Respondent: Farideh P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner: James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vega v. Annucci
as 9:2024cv00019
Petitioner: Jason A. Vega
Respondent: Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?