Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

P. Petitions - Prison Condition Cases filed in the New York Southern District Court before Richard C. Casey [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 9 of 9
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
February 21, 2007
Motz v. Sullivan County Sheriff Hague et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff: Richard Motz; Defendant: Sullivan County Sheriff Hague, John Doe, Pugh Doe, Alonzo Doe, Lynch Doe and others...
 
January 11, 2007
Allah v. Civitella et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff: Supreme Allah; Defendant: Civitella, B. Anderson, E. Scott, M. Mulkins
 
November 3, 2006
Samuels v. Doe et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
May 3, 2006
Wright v. New York State Department of Correctional Services et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
June 30, 2005
Vasquez v. Mr. Runned RN NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
February 4, 2005
Gibson v. Davis et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
February 1, 2001
Garcia, et al v. Goord, et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
November 9, 2000
Rodriguez v. Ward, et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Prisoner Civil Rights
November 1, 2000
Reyes v. N.Y.C. Correctional, et al NY Southern Casey Prison Condition Federal Question
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.