US District Court for the Southern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,578
Scharkey v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv01229
Petitioner:
James Scharkey
Respondent:
S. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Willy Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Poindexter v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01258
Petitioner:
Dewell Poindexter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John Doe v. NYC Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01139
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
NYC Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
Joseph Ray
Respondent:
Warden Jamal Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arroyo v. District Attorney, Queens County et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Anibal Arroyo
Respondent:
District Attorney, Queens County, Ian Ramae, Esq. and Assistant District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. State of New Jersey
as 1:2024cv00618
Petitioner:
Felicia Bynum
Respondent:
State of New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kemp v. McCarthy
as 1:2024cv00504
Petitioner:
Gary Kemp
Respondent:
Kevin McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harriot v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Michael Harriot
Respondent:
Warden L. J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Samuelson
as 1:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Jinja J. Kyng Pariah Johnson
Respondent:
Superintendent Samuelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.