US District Court for the Western District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,898
Brown v. Panessa et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Lamont Brown
Defendant:
Sgt. Panessa, Erie County Medical Center, Niagara County Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Fordham
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Ms. Anne L. Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Grant H. Monroe
Defendant:
U.P.M.C. E.R. Attending Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Hanick Hall Medical Department
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Antonio Hogan
Defendant:
Hanick Hall Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06002
Plaintiff:
Drevon Hall
Defendant:
Todd Baxter and Deputy Latona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saracina et al v. Haendiges et al
as 6:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Saracina, Perez Authtry, Jason Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Deborah A. Haendiges, Shelia O'Sullivan Thie and John J. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Latona et al
as 6:2023cv06735
Plaintiff:
Clint Edwards
Defendant:
Superintendent L. Latona, Poff, Lieutenant Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almonte v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Joel Almonte
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe's and Area S.G.T
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Vanetten
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Sequita K. Wright
Defendant:
Thomas Vanetten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
