US District Court for the Western District of New York Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 236
United States of America v. All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen, et. al., All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC, All Contract Rights, Interest in and any Payments due on Michael Luehrsens 10% Class A membership interest in C3 Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. One 2017 Bentley Mulsanne, VIN: SCBBG7ZH5HC002930 Titled and Registered to David B. Scrivani
as 1:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2017 Bentley Mulsanne, VIN: SCBBG7ZH5HC002930 Titled and Registered to David B. Scrivani
Claimant:
David B. Scrivani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. One (1) Remington Arms Co. Model 14A, 35 REM caliber rifle, bearing serial no. C73727, et al
as 1:2023mc00030
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Remington Arms Co. Model 14A, 35 REM caliber rifle, bearing serial no. C73727, One (1) Savage Arms Inc. Mark II .22 caliber rifle, bearing serial no. 3951680, One (1) Anderson Manufacturing, Model AM-15 Multi, .300 Blackout caliber short barrel rifle, bearing serial no. 21134370 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 2020 BMW X5 VIN: 5UXCR6C00L9C83972
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2020 BMW X5 VIN: 5UXCR6C00L9C83972
Claimant:
Liam Cleary, Tammy Cleary and Kevin Cleary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
Claimant:
Nina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $131,901.65 U.S. Currency Seized from Bank of America Account, et al.
as 1:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$131,901.65 U.S. Currency Seized from Bank of America Account, et al., $131,901.65 U.S. Currency Seized from Bank of America Account, $460,986.32 United States currency seized from First Niagara Bank account number XXXXXX4836 in the name of Frank Parlato IOLA Fund of the State of New York and others
Claimant:
Frank R. Parlato, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Chen-Baker
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Hsueh-Hsin Chen-Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. One Savage Arms Shotgun Bearing Serial Number J107468 et al
as 1:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Savage Arms Shotgun Bearing Serial Number J107468, One Mossberg 500A shotgun bearing serial number R394717, 43 rounds of 12-gauge shotgun ammuntion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $11,897 United States Currency
as 6:2021cv06655
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,897 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Daley
as 1:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mary Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
