New York Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 961
Hohimer Wealth Management LLC v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv11138
Plaintiff:
Hohimer Wealth Management LLC
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L. Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
Baek v. CubeNet Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09398
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baek
Defendant:
CubeNet Inc. and Byung Uk Yu
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hattori et al v. Anand et al
as 1:2023cv11043
Plaintiff:
Mark Hattori and Susan Newman
Defendant:
Gaurav Anand, Matthew Christensen, Lydia Jett and others
Schur v. Dougan et al
as 1:2023cv10944
Plaintiff:
Peter Schur
Defendant:
Brady W. Dougan, Eric Varvel, James L Amine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
Bull v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bull
Defendant:
Thomas J. Murphy, Penko K. Ivanov, Edward J. Campanella and others
Kain et al v. Tetrault et al
as 1:2023cv10337
Plaintiff:
Marino Kain, Wayne Kerris and Perry Russell
Defendant:
Lynn Tetrault, Alison Hannah, Bruce Crowther and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lang v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv08316
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Lang
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, George Mattson and others
Cooper et al v. Boone et al
as 1:2023cv07193
Plaintiff:
Courtney Cooper and Abdo P. Faissal
Defendant:
Karen Boone, John Callaghan, Elizabeth F. Coddington and others
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. v. Jupiter Wellness, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07874
Plaintiff:
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd.
Defendant:
Jupiter Wellness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chowdhury v. Dwight et al
as 1:2023cv06555
Plaintiff:
Aziz Chowdhury
Defendant:
Craig M. Dwight, Mark E. Secor, Susan D. Aaron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
