Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Browse by Judge

 



Other Statutes - Banks and Banking Cases filed in the North Carolina Eastern District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 24, 2009
First National Bank of Omaha v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al NC Eastern Dever Banks and Banking Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Plaintiff: First National Bank of Omaha Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, John J Burney, III
 
November 11, 2009
McFadgen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al NC Eastern Boyle Banks and Banking Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Janice McFadgen Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Home Finance, LLC
 
September 18, 2009
Ken Smith, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") NC Eastern Fox Banks and Banking Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Plaintiff: Ken Smith, Inc. Defendant: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 
January 13, 2005
Hansen v. Homebound Mortgage,, et al NC Eastern Britt Banks and Banking Notice of Removal
December 30, 2004
Discover Bank v. Brown NC Eastern Britt Banks and Banking Notice of Removal
September 24, 2004
Republic Bank & Trus v. Kucan, et al NC Eastern Flanagan Banks and Banking Declaratory Judgment
April 13, 2004
Blue, et al v. Equicredit Corporati, et al NC Eastern Flanagan Banks and Banking Notice of Removal
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.