US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 68
UNITED STATES v. VERBAL et al
as 1:2016cv00441
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CLAUDE ARTHUR VERBAL, II, LESLIE LOUISE BREWSTER, NIKKI ANNE BREWSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7407
COGGIN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
ALICE COGGIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
USA v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2015cv01090
Defendant:
EVELYN WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAW
as 1:2014cv01020
Defendant:
JOHNNIE R. SHAW
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PLUMMER et al
as 1:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES W. PLUMMER, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , MECHANICS AND FARMERS BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES v. SHORT
as 1:2013cv00899
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TONY W. SHORT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
CARTER v. LEW
as 1:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY CARTER
Defendant:
JACOB JOSEPH LEW
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BURGE
as 1:2012cv01220
Defendant:
DAVID B. BURGE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TRUESDALE, et al
as 1:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD LEE TRUESDALE, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, LLC, CARRUTHERS & ROTH, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
EPCON COMMUNITIES CAROLINAS, LLC et al v. TILLEY, et al
as 1:2011cv00643
Plaintiff:
EPCON COMMUNITIES CAROLINAS, LLC and EPCON FARRINGTON LLC
Defendant:
IRIS M. TILLEY, THOMAS E. TILLEY, MELBA GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
