US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
WARREN v. TOLBERT, ET AL
as 1:2016cv01401
Plaintiff:
TINIKA S. WARREN
Defendant:
BRAD TOLBERT, TERRI JONES, MARK WAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. HART et al
as 1:2010cv00538
Defendant:
STEPHEN DOUGLAS HART and JOHN HALL HART
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. MCCOY, et al
as 1:2009cv00288
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
PAUL B. MCCOY and BARBARA C. MCCOY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. WOMBLE
as 1:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HYDROELECTRIC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
GEORGE WOMBLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2006cv00777
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PROPERTY, 1.374 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2005cv01143
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condemnation
SPRUILL v. HAYES et al
as 1:2005cv00734
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
