US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,298
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FUTRELL v. SCARANTINO
as 1:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
JULE C. FUTRELL
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PAUL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
MELVIN RAIMUND PAUL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HALLUM v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00616
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMONT HALLUM
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. WARDEN, DP.S. et al
as 1:2023cv00603
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DP.S. and D.A.C., STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. BRUNSWICK COUNTY COURT
as 1:2023cv00602
Petitioner:
JOEY LAVON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRUNSWICK COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMERSON v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
PIERRE ALEXANDER AMERSON
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and TIMOTHY D. MOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
LAMANUEL LAMAR KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FLEMING v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
CARL L. FLEMING
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Forfeiture-Materials Involv.Sexual Exploit.of Minors
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
