Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Browse by Judge

 



Contract - Contract Product Liability Cases filed in the North Carolina Western District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 6 of 6
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 20, 2008
Olsen v. Ipex, Inc. et al NC Western Whitney Contract Product Liability Diversity
Plaintiff: Thomas Olsen; Defendant: Ipex, Inc., Ipex USA, LLC
 
December 17, 2007
Stronghaven, Inc. v. Consolidated Carqueville Printing Company NC Western Conrad Contract Product Liability Diversity - Notice of Removal
Plaintiff: Stronghaven, Inc.; Defendant: Consolidated Carqueville Printing Company
 
April 12, 2007
Midstate Mills, Incorporated v. Wedlock Paper Converters Limited NC Western Voorhees Contract Product Liability Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Plaintiff: Midstate Mills, Incorporated; Defendant: Wedlock Paper Converters Limited
 
September 13, 2006
Scholl v. Sagon RV Supercenter, L.L.C. et al NC Western Voorhees Contract Product Liability Diversity-(Citizenship)
November 18, 2005
Fashion Network, Inc. v. Chesterfield Manufacturing, Corp. et al NC Western Mullen Contract Product Liability Diversity-Product Liability
November 14, 2005
Condominiums at Latta Pavilion Owners Association, Inc. et al v. Crystal Window & Doore Systems, Ltd. NC Western Mullen Contract Product Liability Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.