North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,287
Sherard v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Clarice Sherard
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Jovanne Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Mills v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Mills
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Matthews v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jesseca Matthews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McLean v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Antoine McLean
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
WILSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
CAROL FESPERMAN WILSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Edge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bryan Norman Edge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Proffitt v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00006
Defendant:
Tina Marie Proffitt and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
CARBAJAL DE BARRON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA CARBAJAL DE BARRON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jones v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
