North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,592
Staton et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
J'on Staton and Cree Faulkner
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, Christopher Hicks, Nicholas Kirkley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BENNETT v. DORMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BENNETT
Defendant:
JIMMY DORMAN and S.J LETILI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BENNETT v. WOOTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BENNETT
Defendant:
SERGEANT WOOTEN and OFFICER HINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RENZI v. NAPHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RENZI
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR., BRIAN L. GILROY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Elabanjo v. Griffith et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Samantha Elabanjo
Defendant:
B. W. Griffith and Lawrence Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hemphill v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Corey Hemphill
Defendant:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education and Christopher Bernard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McKoy v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKoy
Defendant:
City of Raleigh and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREEMAN v. KIM et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SGT. KIM, SGT. LAURA and LUETENANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WARREN v. BRASWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
RICHARD D. WARREN, JR.
Respondent:
TYLER BRASWELL, North Carolina Department of Insurance, New Hanover County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
