North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,940
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner: Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent: Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMahon v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02057
Petitioner: Michael Joseph McMahon
Respondent: Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ransom v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02058
Petitioner: Clarence Michael Ransom
Respondent: Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peterson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02056
Petitioner: Lowell Peterson
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024cv00083
Petitioner: Oscar Perez
Respondent: Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Littlejohn v. Hawkins
as 5:2024hc02054
Petitioner: Jermaine Valgaue Littlejohn
Respondent: Warden Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda Banos v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02055
Petitioner: Victor Manuel Miranda Banos
Respondent: Dean Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner: MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent: MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannon v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02053
Petitioner: Stephen Michael Cannon
Respondent: Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner: Shurod Rankin
Respondent: Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?