North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 331
Whiting v. Truist Bank
as 3:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Denise Whiting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TOWNES v. CELLULAR SALES SERVICES GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
ANDREA TOWNES
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC and CELLULAR SALES SERVICES GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Lawson v. Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC
as 7:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lawson
Defendant:
Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DORVIT v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DORVIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAWKINS v. PEDULLA TRUCKING, EXCAVATING & PAVING, INC.
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
PEDULLA TRUCKING, EXCAVATING & PAVING, INC.
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SAPP v. SESSIONM, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Defendant:
SESSIONM, INC. and MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SAPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy et al v. Active Energy Group, PLC et al
as 7:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel McCarthy, Mr Phil Scalzo, Daniel McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Advanced Biomass Solutions, PLC, Lumberton Energy Holdings, LLC, ACTIVE ENERGY GROUP, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRINH v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv00105
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
DAVID TRINH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahan v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Joseph Jones and Graham County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Brent McMahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMahan v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00009
Plaintiff:
Reba McMahan
Defendant:
Joseph Jones, Graham County Sheriff's Office and Jerry Crisp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
