Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Browse by Judge

 



Real Property - Land Condemnation Cases filed in the Ohio Northern District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 13 of 13
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 30, 2009
Columbia Gas Transmission LLC OH Northern Gwin Land Condemnation Natural Gas Act
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission LLC Defendant: Ava Crawford, Charles R Crawford, The Lois Oyster Revocable Living Trust, U.A., Van Ross Wade, Shirley J Wade and others...
 
May 7, 2009
Meacham, etal. vs. City of Akron, etal. OH Northern Dowd Land Condemnation Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff: John S Meacham, Barbara Meacham Defendant: City of Akron Department of Planning and Urban Development, City of Akron, c/o Mayor Donald Plusquellic, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
 
April 9, 2009
Columbia Gas Transmission LLC v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 6-inch Gas Transmission Pipeline Across Property in Holmes County, Ohio, Owned by Melody A. Mayer (Tax Map 2700621003) et al OH Northern Lioi Land Condemnation Federal Question
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission LLC; Defendant: An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 6-inch Gas Transmission Pipeline Across Property in Holmes County, Ohio, Owned by Melody A. Mayer (Tax Map 2700621003), Unknown Persons and Interested Parties
 
February 11, 2009
Daubel et al v. Sandusky Township, et al. OH Northern Carr Land Condemnation Federal Question
Plaintiff: Marlene M Daubel, Philip F Daubel; Defendant: Sandusky Township, Sandusky Township Board of Trustees
 
Filing Error OH Northern Land Condemnation Federal Question
Plaintiff: Reynold J. Hirt, Sandra Sue Hirt; Defendant: Sandusky Township
 
Hirt et al v. Sandusky Township, et al. OH Northern Carr Land Condemnation Federal Question
Plaintiff: Reynold J Hirt, Sandra Sue Hirt; Defendant: Sandusky Township, Sandusky Township Board of Trustees
 
November 25, 2008
Sammons et al v. City of Cleveland OH Northern Gaughan Land Condemnation Federal Question
Plaintiff: Roger Sammons, Amberly Sammons; Defendant: City of Cleveland
 
April 30, 2008
United States of America v. .8951 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio OH Northern O'Malley Land Condemnation U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: .8951 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio
 
February 19, 2007
LaSalle Bank National Association v. Ungashick et al OH Northern Adams Land Condemnation Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff: LaSalle Bank National Association; Defendant: John Ungashick, Diane M. Ungashick, Miracle Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc., Stark County Treasurer
 
June 12, 2006
Robinson v. City of Cleveland OH Northern Gaughan Land Condemnation Petition for Removal
October 25, 2005
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Exclusive Gas Storage Easement under 161.5 Acres of Land in LaGrange Township, Lorain County, Ohio et al OH Northern Lioi Land Condemnation Natural Gas Act
September 29, 2004
United States of America v. 46.91 Acres of Land et al OH Northern Gwin Land Condemnation Land Condemnation
March 16, 2004
United States of America v. 52.25 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in the county of Trumbull, state of Ohio and Warren Steel Holdings, LLC, et al., OH Northern Land Condemnation Land Condemnation
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.