Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the Ohio Southern District Court before John D. Holschuh [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 4 of 4
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
September 22, 2008
HMV Properties, LLC et al v. IDC Ohio Holdings, LLC dba IDC Holdings, LLC et al OH Southern Holschuh Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Federal Question
Plaintiff: HMV Properties, LLC, Perinpanathan Trust, Oswood Family Trust; Defendant: IDC Ohio Holdings, LLC dba IDC Holdings, LLC, IDC Ohio Management, LLC, Tom Slack, John Slack, Benjamin Flinders and others...
 
September 2, 2008
Amari v. Spillan et al OH Southern Frost Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Diversity
Plaintiff: Carl Amari; Defendant: Michael S. Spillan, Melissa K Spillian, Triangle Equities, Inc., Triangle Equities Group I, Marshal Light Trading Partnership and others...
 
April 13, 2007
Hager v. ABX Air, Inc. et al OH Southern Holschuh Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff: Ronnie Hager; Defendant: ABX Air, Inc., DHL Holdings (USA), Inc., Joe C Hete, Gene Rhodes, Douglas Steele and others...
 
September 20, 2006
Pethtel v. Washington County Sheriff's Office et al OH Southern Holschuh Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Civil Rights Act
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.