US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30,653
Russell et al v. C.R. BARD,INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Krystal Russell and Shane Russell
Defendant:
C.R. BARD,INC. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sedano-Robbins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Sedano-Robbins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
James Ross
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barone v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01909
Plaintiff:
Michael Barone
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lesniewski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01915
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lesniewski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wiggins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01928
Plaintiff:
David Wiggins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edmunds v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01919
Plaintiff:
Sharon Edmunds
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bockstoce v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bockstoce and Lynda Bockstoce
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dye v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
Tami Dye
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crawford et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Laurie Crawford and Chad Styles
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
