Eastern District of Oklahoma Real Property Cases

Land Condemnation Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Department of Transportation v. 0.41 Acres of Land, Situated in Wagoner County, Oklahoma, More or Less et al
as 6:2013cv00537
Defendant: Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners, Federal National Mortgage Association, 0.41 Acres of Land, Situated in Wagoner County, Oklahoma, More or Less and others
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: Condemnation of lands under laws of States
Department of Transportation v. Blackwell et al
as 6:2013cv00490
Defendant: United States of America Department of the Treasury, Tambra L. Blackwell, Charles W. Blackwell and others
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: Quiet Title
State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 6:2011cv00396
Plaintiff: State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association, McCurtain County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: Condemnation of lands under laws of States
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company v. A 150-foot wide (more or less) permanent electric utility easement consisting of 4.83 acres located in Choctaw County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2011cv00261
Defendant: Any Unknown Owners, United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, The Heirs and Successors (if any) of Janet M. Phillips and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company
Cause Of Action: Condemnation of lands under laws of States
v. Department of Transportation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00296
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Eli Williams, Jr., Rebekah Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: Condemnation of lands under laws of States
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2010cv00273
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Atoka County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: Compensation for Land Condemnation
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2010cv00016
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Lillian Mingo, Della Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: Condemnation of lands under laws of States
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2010cv00017
Plaintiff: Department of Transportation
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Joyce Ann Yahola Core, Asi Yahola
Cause Of Action: Condemnation of lands under laws of States
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the West Half (W/2) of Section 34, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M. and the Northwest Quarter (NW/4) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00299
Defendant: Riverbend Ranch, LP, A strip of land located in the West Half (W/2) of Section 34, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M. and the Northwest Quarter (NW/4) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the North Half (N/2) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma
as 6:2008cv00293
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: A strip of land located in the North Half (N/2) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma, Foster OK Resources L.P. of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
1 2 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.