US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,172
Scott v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner: Shannon Latarion Scott
Respondent: Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00127
Petitioner: Milton D Grayson, Jr
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner: John E Heavener
Defendant: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant: David Buss and Getner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner: Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Sweet
as 4:2024cv00044
Petitioner: Shaynna Lauren Sims
Respondent: Christe Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cantrell v. White
as 4:2024cv00018
Petitioner: Christy Cantrell
Respondent: Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00556
Petitioner: Christopher J Barnett
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner: David George Clark
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?