US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,776
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Aaron C Purdy
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carpenter v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Matthew A Carpenter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tiger v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Sam D Tiger
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winfrey v. Louthan
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Ted James Winfrey
Respondent:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brodeur v. US Government
as 5:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beck v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Patrick Beck
Respondent:
FNU LNU, US Marshals and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
