Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Federal Tax Suits - IRS-Third Party Cases filed in Oklahoma

Browse by Court

 



Federal Tax Suits - IRS-Third Party Cases filed in Oklahoma
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
December 8, 2009
Sky Holdings Limited et al v. United States of America et al OK Northern Payne IRS-Third Party IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Plaintiff: Sky Holdings Limited Partnership, Sky Holdings Limited Partnership, Sky Holdings Limited Partnership, RWT Leasing, Inc., RWT Leasing, Inc. and others... Defendant: United States of America, SpiritBank, N.A., Charles Schwab & Co, Inc.
 
July 2, 2009
United States of America v. Hutsell et al OK Western Cauthron IRS-Third Party IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: Danny S Hutsell, Donna L Hutsell
 
July 9, 2008
United States of America v. Laidley OK Western Cauthron IRS-Third Party U.S. Government Plaintiff
Petitioner: United States of America, Respondent: Charles Laidley
 
April 29, 2005
John H Migliaccio MD PC et al v. Internal Revenue Service OK Western Leonard IRS-Third Party IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
March 11, 2005
Holland v. USA OK Northern Eagan IRS-Third Party IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
January 10, 2005
Beat v. United States of America OK Western Russell IRS-Third Party IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.