Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before C. DARNELL JONES II

Browse by Type of Intellectual Property Lawsuit

 



Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before C. DARNELL JONES II [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 10, 2009
FISH NET, INC. v. OCEAN COUNTY REEF AQUATICS et al PA Eastern JONES Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: FISH NET, INC. Defendant: OCEAN COUNTY REEF AQUATICS, DAVID HOOVER
 
October 21, 2009
SCHOLZ DESIGN, INC. v. BRUCE H. NASH, INC. et al PA Eastern JONES Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: SCHOLZ DESIGN, INC. Defendant: BRUCE H. NASH, INC., MASANO ARCHITECTS GROUP, INC., RAY S. BISHOP, TERI A. BISHOP
 
August 13, 2009
SNYDER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. KEFCO, INC. PA Eastern JONES Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: SNYDER INDUSTRIES, INC. Defendant: KEFCO, INC.
 
August 7, 2009
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION PA Eastern JONES Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. Defendant: CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
 
January 13, 2009
BOLLMAN HAT COMPANY v. GREG NORMAN INTERACTIVE, L.L.C. PA Eastern JONES Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: BOLLMAN HAT COMPANY; Defendant: GREG NORMAN INTERACTIVE, L.L.C.
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.