Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Patent Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before J. CURTIS JOYNER [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 8, 2009
SUN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. RITE AID CORPORATION PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: SUN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC. Defendant: RITE AID CORPORATION
 
August 5, 2009
DARTON ARCHERY, INC. et al v. GRACE ENGINEERING CORP. et al PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: DARTON ARCHERY, INC., DARTON ARCHERY, INC., REX DARLINGTON, REX DARLINGTON Defendant: GRACE ENGINEERING CORP., G5 OUTDOORS LLC., ELITE OUTDOORS LLC
 
June 25, 2007
HENSHAW v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff: TODD L. HENSHAW; Defendant: STRYKER CORPORATION, HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
 
May 11, 2006
SOUTHCO, INC. v. REELL PRECISION MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Patent Infringement
April 17, 2006
SPECIALTY SURFACES INTERNATIONAL INC. et al v. FOREVER GREEN ATHLETIC FIELDS, INC. et al PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Patent Infringement
November 29, 2004
DAVLYN MANUFACTURING CO., INC. v. H&M AUTO PARTS, INC. PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Patent Infringement
January 7, 2003
SYNTHES (U.S.A.) v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. PA Eastern JOYNER Patent Patent Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.