Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before LOUIS H. POLLAK [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 10, 2008
WISNIEWSKI v. J. A. REINHOLD ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. et al PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Federal Question
September 4, 2007
HOPKINS et al v. NEW DAY FINANCIAL LLC et al PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff: KELLY HOPKINS, BYRON A. GORCEY, KEVIN VANIC, BRIAN J. SMITH, MATTHEW ADEN and others...; Defendant: NEW DAY FINANCIAL LLC, ROBERT POSNER, PAUL ALGER
 
February 23, 2007
OWENS v. SADSBURY TOWNSHIP et al PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff: WILLIAM R. OWENS; Defendant: SADSBURY TOWNSHIP, DOUGLAS B. DORATT, DALE L. HENSEL, RALPH T. GARRIS, JR.
 
December 30, 2005
MOSER v. POLYMER DYNAMICS, INC. PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
April 1, 2005
RIVERA v. THE BRICKMAN GROUP, LTD PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
February 2, 2005
MASON et al v. NEW DAY FINANCIAL, LLC et al PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
October 31, 2000
JOHNSON v. KING PARATRANSIT, et al PA Eastern POLLAK Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.