Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Patent Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before GENE E.K. PRATTER [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
September 30, 2009
SUN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: SUN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC. Defendant: DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
 
June 19, 2009
TRANSCORE, L.P. v. MARK IV INDUSTRIES CORP. PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: TRANSCORE, L.P. Defendant: MARK IV INDUSTRIES CORP.
 
July 23, 2008
SCREEN MACHINE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. KEYSTONE PROCESSING EQUIPMENT COMPANY et al PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: SCREEN MACHINE INDUSTRIES, INC.; Defendant: KEYSTONE PROCESSING EQUIPMENT COMPANY, JOHNSON CRUSHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
June 18, 2007
MCGOWAN v. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY F. MCGOWAN; Defendant: CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.
 
December 20, 2006
RIO BRANDS, INC. v. JGR COPA, LLC PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Patent Infringement
July 7, 2006
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION et al PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Patent Infringement
June 22, 2006
DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS, INC. v. FGX INTERNATIONAL, INC. PA Eastern PRATTER Patent Patent Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.