Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Labor Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before JOEL H. SLOMSKY




Labor Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before JOEL H. SLOMSKY [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 18 of 18
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
September 9, 2009
TEMPLIN et al v. INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER TEMPLIN, VIOLA HENDRICKS, FELDMAN'S MEDICAL CENTER PHARMACY, INC., FCS PHARMACY LLC Defendant: INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, QCC INSURANCE COMPANY, CAREFIRST, INC.
 
September 3, 2009
PHILADELPHIA HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES-DISTRICT 1199C TRAINING AND UPGRADING FUND et al v. THE CONSORTIUM PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff: PHILADELPHIA HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES-DISTRICT 1199C TRAINING AND UPGRADING FUND, CHERYL FELDMAN Defendant: THE CONSORTIUM
 
August 13, 2009
MCDERMOTT v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MCDERMOTT Defendant: THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., PATHMARK STORES, INC.
 
June 12, 2009
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19 et al v. MCN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff: SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' PENSION FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' ANNUITY FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' VACATION FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 and others... Defendant: MCN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC, 5808 MALVERN AVENUE, TERRANCE MCNAIR, 5808 MALVERN AVENUE
 
May 13, 2009
DUEHR v. JOHNSTOWN SPECIALTY CASTINGS INC. PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff: MERLE J. DUEHR, JR Defendant: JOHNSTOWN SPECIALTY CASTINGS INC.
 
RIGOLIZZO v. QUIGLEY et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER J. RIGOLIZZO Defendant: CHRISTOPHER M. QUIGLEY, DONALD F. GAYHARDT, JR., KEVIN J. LUCEY, ETF ASSOCIATES, LLC
 
May 12, 2009
FORESTER v. QUIGLEY et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Fair Labor Standards Act Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff: MATTHEW L. FORESTER Defendant: CHRISTOPHER M. QUIGLEY, DONALD F. GAYHARDT, JR., KEVIN J. LUCEY, ETF ASSOCIATES, LLC
 
May 7, 2009
BENNETT v. VISION AUTO, INC. et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 COBRA
Plaintiff: DANIELLE BENNETT Defendant: VISION AUTO, INC., AMERIFLEX, LLC
 
April 28, 2009
ROSSER v. T.N. WARD COMPANY PA Eastern SLOMSKY Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff: ANTHONY D. ROSSER, ANTHONY D. ROSSER Defendant: T.N. WARD COMPANY
 
March 5, 2009
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND, JOSEPH J. SAMOLEWICZ; Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
 
March 3, 2009
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND et al v. BILLINGSLEY-DONNELLY, INC. PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND; Defendant: BILLINGSLEY-DONNELLY, INC.
 
February 11, 2009
RACHILLA et al v. MACK TRUCKS, INCORPORATED et al PA Eastern GOLDEN Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: MARTIN RACHILLA, JOSEPH E. CRAIG, JR., JOHN R. WAHLER, RONALD L. ROYER, DOROTHY GANTZ and others...; Defendant: MACK TRUCKS, INCORPORATED, MACK TRUCKS, INCORPORATED RETIREE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
 
January 29, 2009
SLEIMAN v. DHL EXPRESS PA Eastern SLOMSKY Fair Labor Standards Act Federal Question
Plaintiff: ELIAS SLEIMAN; Defendant: DHL EXPRESS
 
January 16, 2009
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401 (K) RETIREMENT PLAN v. QUEST ELEVATOR, INC. et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401 (K) RETIREMENT PLAN; Defendant: QUEST ELEVATOR, INC., ALLAN R. WILLBANKS
 
November 4, 2008
LUCAS v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: ERIC H. LUCAS; Defendant: ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO.
 
June 30, 2006
BENEFIT FUND FOR HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES - PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY v. WILLIAM B. KESSLER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
January 9, 1990
TEAMSTERS PENSION, et al v. AAA TRUCKING CORP, et al PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
October 10, 1989
TEAMSTERS PENSION, et al v. HOMES TRANSPORTATION PA Eastern SLOMSKY Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.