Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Other Statutes - Antitrust Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court before LAWRENCE F. STENGEL [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 4 of 4
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
August 19, 2009
STOLTZFUS et al v. LITTLE ELK CREEK FARM, LLC et al PA Eastern STENGEL Antitrust Notice of Removal
Plaintiff: DANIEL STOLTZFUS, SAVILLA STOLTZFUS Defendant: LITTLE ELK CREEK FARM, LLC, PSR LANCASTER, LLC, PSR KIRKWOOD, LLC, THE LAW OFFICES OF BYLER, GOODLEY & WINKLE P.C., WILLIAM BRYAN BYLER and others...
 
July 21, 2009
PRIME FUNDING, INC. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PA Eastern STENGEL Antitrust Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff: PRIME FUNDING, INC. Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
 
February 4, 2009
STOLTZFUS et al v. OLD ORDER AMISH HELPING PROGRAM AND LEVI ESH et al PA Eastern STENGEL Antitrust Federal Question
Plaintiff: DANIEL STOLTZFUS, SAVILLA STOLTZFUS; Defendant: OLD ORDER AMISH HELPING PROGRAM AND LEVI ESH, AMISH AID SOCIETY, AMISH SOCIETY OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PA, LITTLE ELK CREEK FARM, LLC, PSR LANCASTER, LLC and others...
 
September 26, 2008
SOMERSET INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CAL-MAINE FOODS INC. et al PA Eastern STENGEL Antitrust Federal Question
Plaintiff: SOMERSET INDUSTRIES, INC.; Defendant: CAL-MAINE FOODS INC., GOLDEN OVAL EGGS LLC, MICHAEL FOODS INC., MOARK LLC, UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, INC. and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.