US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 653
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. EVENLITE, INC.
as 2:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
EVENLITE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC v. THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
BRIGHT CAPTURE LLC
Defendant:
THE NEAT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WITRICITY CORPORATION v. INDUCTEV, INC.
as 2:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
WITRICITY CORPORATION
Defendant:
INDUCTEV, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Defendant:
CONNECTIFY, INC. and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
JES GEAR, LLC et al v. SALVITTI
as 2:2022cv04847
Plaintiff:
JES GEAR, LLC and JL CREATIVE GROUP, LLC doing business as WARRIOR POET CUPPLY CO.
Defendant:
ALFRED W. SALVITTI
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BREEO LLC v. AMD DIRECT INC.
as 5:2022cv04451
Plaintiff:
BREEO LLC
Defendant:
AMD DIRECT INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
OHVA, INC. v. MAGTEK, INC.
as 2:2022cv03628
Plaintiff:
OHVA, INC.
Defendant:
MAGTEK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
OPEX CORPORATION, v. INVATA, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03601
Plaintiff:
OPEX CORPORATION,
Defendant:
INVATA, LLC and HC ROBOTICS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MCS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. At Home Stores LLC et al
as 5:2022cv03436
Plaintiff:
MCS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
AT HOME STORES LLC and AT HOME PROCUREMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HYDRO NET LLC v. RED LION CONTROLS, LLC
as 2:2022cv02996
Plaintiff:
HYDRO NET LLC
Defendant:
RED LION CONTROLS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
