US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,028
Devine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Devine obo Anthony Devine and ROSE M. DEVINE
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PATLAKH v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2023cv05120
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PATLAKH
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HYMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2023cv05112
Plaintiff:
GENEVA NICOLE HYMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BYRD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv04957
Plaintiff:
NICOLE BYRD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Casey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv04851
Plaintiff:
John Casey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VANCE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv04775
Plaintiff:
NADIYAH VANCE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2023cv04771
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, LEVENTHAL, SUTTON & GORNSTEIN, JESS LEVENTHAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DOBBINS, IV v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv04701
Plaintiff:
WALTER N. DOBBINS, IV
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MILCZAREK v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04623
Plaintiff:
MELISSA HILL MILCZAREK
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RODRIGUEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
DEBRA MARIE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
