Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Trademark Cases filed in the Pennsylvania Western District Court before David S. Cercone [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 20 of 20
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 28, 2009
QUANTUM SIMULATIONS, INC. v. QUANTUM LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: QUANTUM SIMULATIONS, INC. Defendant: QUANTUM LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
October 1, 2009
COMPLIANCE CONCEPTS, INC. v. PRECHECK, INC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Injunction
Plaintiff: COMPLIANCE CONCEPTS, INC. Defendant: PRECHECK, INC.
 
July 13, 2009
EAT'N PARK HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC. et al v. FORGET-ME-KNOT GIFTS PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: EAT'N PARK HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., EPR HOLDINGS, INC. Defendant: FORGET-ME-KNOT GIFTS
 
February 26, 2009
EAT'N PARK HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC. et al v. FORGET-ME-KNOT GIFTS PA Western Cercone Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: EAT'N PARK HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., EPR HOLDINGS, INC.; Defendant: FORGET-ME-KNOT GIFTS
 
January 13, 2009
VOCELLI PIZZA, L.P. v. FIORE & SARARO, INC. et al PA Western Cercone Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: VOCELLI PIZZA, L.P.; Defendant: FIORE & SARARO, INC., ALICE KOWALSKI
 
November 20, 2008
UNITED TRUCK & EQUIPMENT, INC. v. CURRY SUPPLY COMPANY, ET AL PA Western Cercone Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: UNITED TRUCK & EQUIPMENT INC; Defendant: CURRY SUPPLY COMPANY, CHRISTOPHER RITCHEY
 
August 20, 2008
PENNSYLVANIA PURE DISTILLERIES, LLC. v. BOYD COFFEE COMPANY PA Western Cercone Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA PURE DISTILLERIES, LLC.; Defendant: BOYD COFFEE COMPANY
 
June 9, 2008
KATZ v. RBI DEVELOPMENT LLC PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff: JAMES R. KATZ; Defendant: RBI DEVELOPMENT LLC
 
May 18, 2007
GNC FRANCHISING LLC et al v. DUBOIS NUTRITION, INC. et al PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: GNC FRANCHISING LLC, GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION; Defendant: DUBOIS NUTRITION, INC., CHRISTOPHER DUBOIS, SHELLEY DUBOIS
 
November 9, 2006
H2 DESIGN GROUP, INC. v. H2 SEO, LLC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
September 22, 2006
JOY TECHNOLOGIES INC. et al PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
April 5, 2006
STRATEGIC ENERGY, L.L.C. v. STRATEGIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
October 28, 2005
PENNZOIL-QUAKER STATE COMPANY v. SMITH PA Western Cercone Trademark Federal Question
September 12, 2005
JOY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al v. AUXIER WELDING, INC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
July 27, 2005
TECHNOLOGY & ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES LAW GROUP, PC v. EXIPERT, INC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
May 17, 2005
COMPUTER GOO-ROOS, I v. GOOROOS, LLC. PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
February 18, 2005
COMPONENTONE, L.L.C. v. VANGUARD SOFTWARE SO, et al PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
January 14, 2005
PERFORMANCE HEALTH v. SHOGO MOCHIZUKI, et al PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2004
ADAMS MFG. CORP. v. U.D.I. CORPORATION, et al PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement
March 9, 2004
MELLON FINANCIAL COR v. MORGAN INVESTMENTS PA Western Cercone Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.