Pennsylvania Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
SONG et al v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2011cv07704
Petitioner:
EDWIN SONG and THU L.
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE COMMISSIONER, STEPHEN J. MCCARRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SIMON
as 2:2011cv07058
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MILDRED PATRICK
Defendant:
TROY L. SIMON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
GREEN v. THE UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv06851
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDRES GREEN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
BEEMAN v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN M. BEEMAN
Defendant:
U.S.A. and JOHN M. KENNEY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
PETERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv03064
Petitioner:
JAY S. PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and LINDA HAWS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
GABYZON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv01470
Plaintiff:
CAROL GABYZON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv02785
Plaintiff:
MYONG HO LEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
STRANAHAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2009cv02725
Plaintiff:
CRAIG H. STRANAHAN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6672 Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
BANDAWAT et al v. UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2008cv03935
Petitioner:
STEVEN J. BANDAWAT and PATRICIA BANDAWAT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
GAKOUMIS v. SETTIMI
as 2:2007cv03341
Plaintiff:
GEORGE P. GAKOUMIS
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SETTIMI
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212 Injunctive Relief from IRS Lien
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
