Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Specialty Freight Services, Inc. v. Morris Trans Corp
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Specialty Freight Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Morris Trans Corp
RAO v. SLEEP NUMBER BED, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02150
Plaintiff:
DR. GUTTI RAO
Defendant:
SLEEP NUMBER BED, INC. and SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SPECIALTY FREIGHT SERVICES, INC. v. ASSURE TRUCKING, LLC
as 2:2023cv04506
Plaintiff:
SPECIALTY FREIGHT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
ASSURE TRUCKING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
Bond v. Equifax Inc.
as 4:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Bond
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ONEX, INC. v. PLIBRICO COMPANY, LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
ONEX, INC.
Defendant:
PLIBRICO COMPANY, LLC and JOHN WARD SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
WESTLAKE PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. v. TFORCE FREIGHT
as 2:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Westlake Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
Defendant:
TFORCE FREIGHT
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Butcher v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
Chad Butcher
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Experian Information Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
