US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,988
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LaFlamme v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Alan LaFlamme
Defendant:
Town of North Kingstown, Debra Bridgham, Patrick Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cofield v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Defendant:
PNC Bank, U.S. Postal Service, N.Y. E.B.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fantel, Jr. v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI, Caitlin Isherwood and Mark Trovato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disability Rights Rhode Island v. Medeiros
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Rhode Island
Defendant:
Katelyn Medeiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
